The initiative, put forth by the Más Madrid group, was rejected with votes against from the Popular Party. This decision aligns with the previously stated position of the regional minister of Economy, Finance, and Employment for the Community of Madrid, who had expressed skepticism about the feasibility of applying this model to the autonomous structure.

During the debate, a deputy from Más Madrid defended the proposal, arguing that society progresses when workers' rights, quality of life, and well-being are enhanced. She emphasized that success does not always come from increased pressure or control, but from workplace dignity.

From the Socialist Party, a deputy also expressed support for the measure, highlighting that the Ministry of Digital Transformation and Public Function has already implemented this reduction in the General State Administration. He noted that this decision was the result of complex negotiations, aiming to maintain the quality of public services and labor rights.

In contrast, a deputy from the Popular Party criticized the left's persistence with this proposal, especially after its implementation in the AGE, calling it a strategy to join what she termed the “Government's trap.” She lamented the absence of an official study on the economic impact of the measure, pointing out that its cost could be high. Furthermore, she stressed the demographic context, with a significant portion of public employees nearing retirement.

Finally, a Vox deputy argued that the Community of Madrid's problem is not a lack of resources, but a lack of courage and political decision. She contended that the rights of public workers should take precedence over other expenses, referring to immigration.