During the control session, opposition groups questioned the management of the trip, labeling it as lacking transparency and criticizing the absence of public events during several days. For its part, the regional executive denied the accusations, ensuring that the agenda included private meetings and commitments with local media after the delegation was excluded from a film event.

The controversy also revolved around the financing of the trip. While the regional government indicated that expenses were limited to the stay in the Mexican capital and the return, the opposition demanded detailed explanations regarding the use of public funds and the justification of activities carried out during the days without an official agenda.

The debate included references to foreign investment in the region, with the announcement of a 77 million euro project by a hospitality firm, a figure that opposition parties consider a recycled announcement from previous months. The discussion also touched on historical and cultural aspects, generating an exchange of reproaches over the management of institutional relations and archaeological heritage.